I just read this article about Gay men in the U.K. and the U.S. differ in definitions of sex..
A recent study conducted by the Kinsey Institute found that gay men in the U.K. and the U.S. define having “had sex” differently.
I quite agree. But it is more than just "intercourse behaviour" gap. Afterall the British men also want sex in all kinds of forms. Men are pigs wherever you are on earth. It is just their approach when it comes to "seducing", "hunt" and "sexing up" without showing much passion what in my opinion makes the big difference. American men are very passionate while English (this excludes Scotish, Welsh and Irish) men are rather uncommunicative what it may mislead to an interpretation they are cold.
It is a behavioural attitude in terms of personality what makes the big difference, not their different conceptions about sex and intercourse.
I have paradoxically had more sex in the UK with American men than with UK men. I believe many of the British men are very gorgeous and lovely people but too shy (if not drunk) to come out even for a quickie. And, of course British men lack of being "too direct" in international standards. And, yes, that's a big turned off. It reminds of my native Uruguay because of the red tape and feeling separate from the rest of people feeling like an oyster. This is the way I feel sometimes despite the fact that in London there are so many foreigners that makes it easier to get by in terms of choices.
My British "lovers" are quite unclear and it looks like they are indecisive, thus I never know what to expect from them. I am afraid of being too direct and just ask them "what do you expect from me?".
This issue I have would not be a problem with American men because it would be just a routine question. Yet I am not sure the way a British person could take it, and I do not want to hurt anyone. So, I just get bored and move on, go on for other men who are more in my "tune" and show interest and/or kind of know what they are after without making it an issue.
To end up this entry I would like to highlight that I know US-gay-men standards to compy with while British men are not that easily standarized. And this is the main reason.


Cristina was brilliant when she brought it up as matter of diginity for the minorities, and we must support equality for everyone without guettoning.
Joaquin Morales Sola makes a good political analysis about it and then Carrio comes back to disagree with the Marriage Equality Bill. I used to admired her, and now I believe she is acting very conservative and politically moralist http://www.tn.com.ar/2010/
This is why I need to cheer Cristina's move and action. People know I dislike Kirchnerismo for many reasons but in this case the position from Nestor and Cristina has shown them as serious and professional politicians as they all should be (period).
Marriage equality one day will be something from the past. Something revolutionary could be this phenomenom "virtual humanity". Imagine a virtual husband?